I’m on a roll today. Even though I should probably save this for another day, I just can’t stop.
This country needs money. The Obama administration is deficient spending through our noses. The rich, businesses of all sizes, and gas and oil companies, to name a few, are being taxed to oblivion. The troops need money, Obama’s plan for universal health care is not going to be cheap, the goal to have everyone in this country with a college degree is going to cost some serious dough. We need money, plain and simple. This is my proposal: enact a taxation on email.
According to one site, 210 billion emails are sent per day. Let’s assume, for the sake of numbers, that 1/2 of those are sent to or from America. That means that 105 billion emails every day would be available for taxation. If Uncle Sam charged just $.05 per email, he would acquire 5.3 billion dollars a day. In just 149 days, about five months, the entire stimulus package of $787 billion could be completely paid for in little more than it costs to send a text message. Perhaps the taxation plan could offer discounts or tax deductions for emails sent within between family members or coworkers to keep business costs feasible, and the stimulus could still be paid for within a year.
Think of all the other advantages of an email taxation: no spam, no email chain-letters, and fewer company advertisings (like Amazon’s “Since you bought that, we know you’ll love this!” emails). If you work in a customer-service based industry, you’d get fewer stupid-question emails, since people would be more likely to research their question before emailing it. There are so many advantages to treating emails like they are text messages!
You could do any one of these things:
Pay for Bush’s bank bailout of $700 billion within five months
Full pay for the new $3.6 trillion budget within Obama’s first term (1.7 years)
In 5.6 years, the entire $10.8 trillion Federal deficit would be $0
If you’re reading this Obama, just know that instead of socialistically taxing only the wealthy, you could communistically fairly tax us all a measly $.05 per email.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Did you know: you can lose weight just by eating right!
Hey everyone, I'm back. Matt's wife, Jak, from that other blog where I post my creative writing and photographic pursuits. Anyway, I've got more to say, so I'm taking over again.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health found that “eating heart-healthy, low-calorie foods and exercising is the key to losing weight regardless of levels of protein, fat or carbohydrates.”
You mean to tell me that the old-fashioned, tried-and-true diets actually work? Are you saying that those newly-invented diets with the latest research findings and technology aren’t as effective? Because I was pretty convinced that the Atkins diet, invented back in the 1970s was the key to wait loss. No, maybe I liked the South Beach diet from the 1980s. Wait, I’m thinking of the Abs Diet, invented just four years ago! That diet is so new, it must utilize all the new technologies available to weight-loss studying gurus! And last year they even released a version specially designed for women to enhance weight loss and promote abs in ways that cater to women’s specific needs and difficulties! There is no way these diets are all marketing gimmicks because my friends knows someone who was on that Atkins diet, and it worked for them! They seriously lost, like, eight pounds, and even kept it off until Christmas! Plus they have all those supplements now. When taken with diet and exercise, they are proven to accelerate results; therefore, diet and exercise alone must not be very effective. Everyone knows that hydroxypropyl cellulose and Acesulfame-potassium are key to developing muscles.
Listen, all you National Institutes of Health, you are going to have to repeat that study time and time again and get the same results in order for me to believe you. Until them, I’m sticking to my other diet, the one I know works. I’ve lost nearly three pounds since January 1st! I would have lost more, but I got busy at the end of January and stopped. But I’m going to start back up again! Probably tomorrow even! Or maybe Monday…I mean, I’m kinda busy this weekend.
Can I plead the grapefruit diet?
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health found that “eating heart-healthy, low-calorie foods and exercising is the key to losing weight regardless of levels of protein, fat or carbohydrates.”
You mean to tell me that the old-fashioned, tried-and-true diets actually work? Are you saying that those newly-invented diets with the latest research findings and technology aren’t as effective? Because I was pretty convinced that the Atkins diet, invented back in the 1970s was the key to wait loss. No, maybe I liked the South Beach diet from the 1980s. Wait, I’m thinking of the Abs Diet, invented just four years ago! That diet is so new, it must utilize all the new technologies available to weight-loss studying gurus! And last year they even released a version specially designed for women to enhance weight loss and promote abs in ways that cater to women’s specific needs and difficulties! There is no way these diets are all marketing gimmicks because my friends knows someone who was on that Atkins diet, and it worked for them! They seriously lost, like, eight pounds, and even kept it off until Christmas! Plus they have all those supplements now. When taken with diet and exercise, they are proven to accelerate results; therefore, diet and exercise alone must not be very effective. Everyone knows that hydroxypropyl cellulose and Acesulfame-potassium are key to developing muscles.
Listen, all you National Institutes of Health, you are going to have to repeat that study time and time again and get the same results in order for me to believe you. Until them, I’m sticking to my other diet, the one I know works. I’ve lost nearly three pounds since January 1st! I would have lost more, but I got busy at the end of January and stopped. But I’m going to start back up again! Probably tomorrow even! Or maybe Monday…I mean, I’m kinda busy this weekend.
Can I plead the grapefruit diet?
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Gold a haven as Government screws economy!
According to the ticker at WSJ.com "The rising price of gold says investors are starting to freak out over governments' response to the credit crunch." (emphasis mine) Obama really needed that stimulus passed right away so that the markets could get back to normal.
No surprise that government intervention is causing such havok. Obama et al. should have read the writing on the wall when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's recovery plan was greeted with negative market action and as the Dow fell 5.1% to 7850.41 since Obama and team "unveiled it's efforts to aid the credit markets" (WSJ - C1)
If the President and Congress actually held to the 48 hour waiting period to review the biggest spending bill in history - as Congress voted unanimously - perhaps some of the damage would have been mitigated by better knowledge and stripping additional pork from the bill.
No surprise that government intervention is causing such havok. Obama et al. should have read the writing on the wall when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's recovery plan was greeted with negative market action and as the Dow fell 5.1% to 7850.41 since Obama and team "unveiled it's efforts to aid the credit markets" (WSJ - C1)
If the President and Congress actually held to the 48 hour waiting period to review the biggest spending bill in history - as Congress voted unanimously - perhaps some of the damage would have been mitigated by better knowledge and stripping additional pork from the bill.
They did it just for fun...
The Wall Street Journal has this headline on A5 - 'Congressional Junkets Defended as Work-Based'. Ric Wagoner and Alan Mulally went to Congress on their jets just for fun...
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Gambling for Charity
There is an article in the Detroit Free Press today regarding gambling under a license issued to a charity. Charitable organizations can apply for "Millionaire Party" licenses allowing for temporary casino style gaming. The article lays the ground work for the the situation, noting the increase in licenses - 493% between September 2004 and September 2008. The only other major concerns are the impact the popularity of has on the Detroit Casinos and if establishments are abusing the privilege by hosting games each night under different charities. In my view, the article wholly misses the relevant question: is it permissible for charities to be funded by gambling activity?
I believe these arrangements avoid many of the common pitfalls that stem from gambling. In my experience, and alluded to by the article, many of the charitable gambling events center around Texas Hold 'em - a relatively benign activity. Often these games have buy-ins, thus limiting the amount of money a person can lose. Poker is a game of skill, thereby limiting the event from being outright exploitation. Also, with the growing popularity of the game, many different types of people would likely take part, not simply a shady crowd. Regarding the same establishment running a game every night under different or rotating charity licenses, as long as the games remain limited, poker and black jack for example, I don't think it would pose much of a threat to the community.
Still, gambling often preys upon the poor and it could be argued the organization is an enabler for those with addictions. I was hoping to gain some local insight into the issue, but, alas, none was to be found.
I believe these arrangements avoid many of the common pitfalls that stem from gambling. In my experience, and alluded to by the article, many of the charitable gambling events center around Texas Hold 'em - a relatively benign activity. Often these games have buy-ins, thus limiting the amount of money a person can lose. Poker is a game of skill, thereby limiting the event from being outright exploitation. Also, with the growing popularity of the game, many different types of people would likely take part, not simply a shady crowd. Regarding the same establishment running a game every night under different or rotating charity licenses, as long as the games remain limited, poker and black jack for example, I don't think it would pose much of a threat to the community.
Still, gambling often preys upon the poor and it could be argued the organization is an enabler for those with addictions. I was hoping to gain some local insight into the issue, but, alas, none was to be found.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Let's Have Safe Drug Use!
Hello everyone. I am Matt’s wife; you can call me Jak. I have my own blog where I post my creative writing and photographic pursuits. However, I have a political thought to express today, and I thought it would fit better on "Thoughts on the Passing Scene."
Wall Street Journal article “Heroin Program’s Deadly Toll” complains that workers whose jobs ask them to provide clean needles in exchange for dirty ones are now suffering from their poor working conditions.
They 1. Earn “little or no money”; 2. Work in “bleak urban” conditions; 3. Are given less training and support compared to other social-service workers; 4. Find it especially hard to cope, since many workers have past drug use or “personal stresses”; and 5. Are “encouraged to put in long hours.” As a result of these circumstances, many workers are overdosing on drugs as a means of suicide. Author Justin Scheck argues that these working conditions need to change.
Workers earn “little or no money”
Scheck argues that the “minuscule” $14 million that needle exchange programs receive from state and local governments is not enough money to pay workers and provide adequate supplies. Programs also need federal funds, he claims, which are currently banned. He states that conventional drug treatment programs receive $1.75 billion from the feds alone. Unfortunately for Scheck’s argument, not all drug treatment programs are created equal. Therapies and rehabilitation programs and workers should receive more money since they seek to cure the addict’s root issue, addiction, not just his symptoms, disease. Therapists also spend years in school, earning degrees from accredited universities. Needle exchangers do not even need high school diplomas. Just as McDonald’s cooks earn less than Italian restaurant chefs, needle exchangers should not make as much as licensed therapists.
Workers operate in “bleak urban” conditions
A needle exchanger’s job requirements are as follows: teach people how to properly administer anti-overdose medication, inject heroine safely, access rehab, and exchanged dirty needles for clean ones. With such a job description, no one should expect a plush corner office. Serious and regular heroine users live in run-down apartments and on the streets. Any program that attempts to reach out to such people will be located on the same dirty urban streets in which addicts live. It would be foolish to expect working conditions to be anything other than bleak.
Workers are given less training and support compared to other social-service workers
Scheck does not say they receive no training, simply less training. Support and training are dependent upon the finances available, and money is a limited resource. When looking at the number of social workers who help abused children and mothers, starving families, rape victims and survivors of natural disasters get their lives back, it becomes obvious that they have earned their priority. Their work helps people regain their lives. Needle exchanges do not help addicts quit using drugs, it only allows them to prolong their use. Needle exchange program workers have not proven that they can benefit society enough to warrant more elaborate training and support programs.
Since many workers have past drug use or “personal stresses,” they find it especially hard to cope
Alcoholics should not be bartenders, child rapists should not work in day care centers, and former drug users should not pass out heroine needles. Also, people whose lives are so stressful they feel the need to abuse drugs should not pass out heroine needles. These people are simply in the wrong field of work.
Workers are “encouraged to put in long hours”
This working condition complaint begs the obvious question: who has not been encouraged to work long hours? Especially workers in a nonprofit field, where people and resources are limited. Lawyers, police officers, and teachers are also pushed into long workdays, not all of whom are handsomely paid. Scheck does not define exactly what “encouraging” techniques are used.
Simply put, needle exchangers work terrible jobs in poor conditions. However, these people do not live in communistic societies, they are free to quit their jobs and find new ones. Just because they provide a public service does not mean they deserve ideal, or even pleasant, working conditions. In a world where equality is everything, we have come to expect that the unequal, no matter how disproportionate, be made equal.
Wall Street Journal article “Heroin Program’s Deadly Toll” complains that workers whose jobs ask them to provide clean needles in exchange for dirty ones are now suffering from their poor working conditions.
They 1. Earn “little or no money”; 2. Work in “bleak urban” conditions; 3. Are given less training and support compared to other social-service workers; 4. Find it especially hard to cope, since many workers have past drug use or “personal stresses”; and 5. Are “encouraged to put in long hours.” As a result of these circumstances, many workers are overdosing on drugs as a means of suicide. Author Justin Scheck argues that these working conditions need to change.
Workers earn “little or no money”
Scheck argues that the “minuscule” $14 million that needle exchange programs receive from state and local governments is not enough money to pay workers and provide adequate supplies. Programs also need federal funds, he claims, which are currently banned. He states that conventional drug treatment programs receive $1.75 billion from the feds alone. Unfortunately for Scheck’s argument, not all drug treatment programs are created equal. Therapies and rehabilitation programs and workers should receive more money since they seek to cure the addict’s root issue, addiction, not just his symptoms, disease. Therapists also spend years in school, earning degrees from accredited universities. Needle exchangers do not even need high school diplomas. Just as McDonald’s cooks earn less than Italian restaurant chefs, needle exchangers should not make as much as licensed therapists.
Workers operate in “bleak urban” conditions
A needle exchanger’s job requirements are as follows: teach people how to properly administer anti-overdose medication, inject heroine safely, access rehab, and exchanged dirty needles for clean ones. With such a job description, no one should expect a plush corner office. Serious and regular heroine users live in run-down apartments and on the streets. Any program that attempts to reach out to such people will be located on the same dirty urban streets in which addicts live. It would be foolish to expect working conditions to be anything other than bleak.
Workers are given less training and support compared to other social-service workers
Scheck does not say they receive no training, simply less training. Support and training are dependent upon the finances available, and money is a limited resource. When looking at the number of social workers who help abused children and mothers, starving families, rape victims and survivors of natural disasters get their lives back, it becomes obvious that they have earned their priority. Their work helps people regain their lives. Needle exchanges do not help addicts quit using drugs, it only allows them to prolong their use. Needle exchange program workers have not proven that they can benefit society enough to warrant more elaborate training and support programs.
Since many workers have past drug use or “personal stresses,” they find it especially hard to cope
Alcoholics should not be bartenders, child rapists should not work in day care centers, and former drug users should not pass out heroine needles. Also, people whose lives are so stressful they feel the need to abuse drugs should not pass out heroine needles. These people are simply in the wrong field of work.
Workers are “encouraged to put in long hours”
This working condition complaint begs the obvious question: who has not been encouraged to work long hours? Especially workers in a nonprofit field, where people and resources are limited. Lawyers, police officers, and teachers are also pushed into long workdays, not all of whom are handsomely paid. Scheck does not define exactly what “encouraging” techniques are used.
Simply put, needle exchangers work terrible jobs in poor conditions. However, these people do not live in communistic societies, they are free to quit their jobs and find new ones. Just because they provide a public service does not mean they deserve ideal, or even pleasant, working conditions. In a world where equality is everything, we have come to expect that the unequal, no matter how disproportionate, be made equal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
